Thursday, May 26, 2005
Tuesday, May 24, 2005
Thursday, May 12, 2005
***** SPOILER WARNING *******
I wondered if the movie would cross-over better if it had Sixth Sense kind of ending where the whole thing was Abe's setup from the start as Abe repeatly went back through time to make things right. And Aaron tries to stop him from messing with the timeline. The dichotomy of their approach would've been more conventional, ie Hollywood, and make the film more comprehensive, in my opinion, and more exciting story.
***** END OF SPOLIER *******
The film likes this gives hope for true independent filmmakers around the world, that good story will be told, and be accepted.
Tuesday, May 10, 2005
Sunday, May 08, 2005
When I watched the film last night, I think Mr. Scott wanted to express something personal on a big screen that will cost, reported, 150 millions of dollars. So he had to compromise on his theme of reglious tolerance when America is moving toward theocracy by President Bush (Jr.) and provide epic battles that sadly mimicks another LOTR battle. Yeah, the CG got better, but what's else is new? There's no one to care for, and pretty boy Orlando Bloom only suffers minor scratch to his face in the heat of the battles. He tries to elevate himself to be a hero as the script dictates, but he just doesn't have the presence, like Russel Crowe in Gladiator. Masked leper king, uncredited Edward Nolton, got more character and presence than Orlando. He is supported by veteran actors, but they vanish when he needs them the most. I'm sadden that Eva Green didn't reveal any flesh to charm me, except to bat her eye lashes. No wonder Orlando turned her down. :-)
The marketing should've concentrated more of essemble of actors in the pictures instead of shouldering all on Orlando Bloom alone. But in the end, the film was murky as the theme got lost in the big stages battles, without making clear statement, and the characters didn't come across personally to affect us. Orlando Bloom's personal redemption got swept away like a sand castle as the picture screamed for more action and blood. Pity.
Maybe people thought they would be watching another LOTR set in a desert with Orlando Bloom and skipped for the DVDs. I believe they are wise to do so. At this rate, even Episode III will likely to disappoint as NO ONE I know is excited about the movie like the first two.
It was a clear example of how to juggle personal themes in the epic background in a film. As evident by this picture, even veteran director like Ridly Scott can have a trouble of balancing those two.
My heart broke for every dead X-Wing pilot in the first film. When Porkins flamed out, I cared. I cared because the battle was kept on a small scale, an identifiable scale. There's no wonder involved in an all-out fight between a gajillion clone troopers and whoever it is they're fighting. (I can't even remember, which is a bad, bad sign.)" I think I can say the same for the Kingdom of Heaven I saw last night. Sigh.
Tuesday, May 03, 2005
Because of the buzz and prestige attached to Fahrenheit 9/11, Harvey Weinstein extracted extremely favorable terms from these distributors, about one-third of what distributors typically charge. Their cut amounted to slightly more than 12 percent of the total they collected from the theaters. As a result, Fahrenheit 9/11's net receipts—what remains after the distributors deduct their percentage and their out-of-pocket expenses (mounting an ad campaign, making prints, dubbing the film)—would be much higher than those of a typical Hollywood film.
Fahrenheit 9/11, now an event, took in more than $228 million in ticket sales worldwide, a record for a documentary, and sold 3 million DVDs, which brought in another $30 million in royalties. After the theaters took their share of the movie's gross (roughly 50 percent) and distributors deducted the marketing expenses (including prints, advertising, dubbing, and custom clearance) and took their own cut, the net receipts returned to Disney were $78 million.
Disney now had to pay Michael Moore's profit participation. Under normal circumstances, documentaries rarely, if ever, make profits (especially if distributors charge the usual 33 percent fee). So, when Miramax made the deal for Fahrenheit 9/11, it allowed Moore a generous profit participation—which turned out to be 27 percent of the film's net receipts. Disney, in honoring this deal, paid Moore a stunning $21 million. Moore never disclosed the amount of his profit participation. When asked about it, the proletarian Moore joked to reporters on a conference call, "I don't read the contracts."
What of Disney? After repaying itself $11 million for acquisition costs, it booked a $46 million net profit, which Eisner split between two subsidiaries, the Disney Foundation and Miramax. While it was far less than Disney made on children's fare such as Finding Nemo, it was not a bad outcome. The Weinstein brothers also made a multimillion-dollar profit. They had a deal with Disney that contractually entitled them to a bonus of between 30 percent and 40 percent of the net profits on any film that they produced—in this case, that came out to about $8 million per brother. (The Weinsteins are now in the process of leaving Miramax.) But Michael Moore had perhaps the happiest ending of all. Not only had he made $21 million, he already had a sequel in preproduction—Fahrenheit 9/11 ½." Follow the money.
